• Home
  • /
    • People/Portraits
    • Abstract
    • Landscapes
    • Religious
    • Still Life
    • Other
  • Drawings
  • Sculpture
  • /
  • Contact
  • Blog
Menu

Richard H. Love

Works of Art by Richard H. Love, 1939-2019
  • Home
  • /
  • Paintings
    • People/Portraits
    • Abstract
    • Landscapes
    • Religious
    • Still Life
    • Other
  • Drawings
  • Sculpture
  • /
  • Contact
  • Blog
americanartday3.jpg

Happy American Art Day!

February 1, 2018

Compared to most nations, America provides few holidays. Having been set up on Judeo-Christian principles, our democracy has evolved celebrating religious holidays, which have become traditional. Moreover, we all take time off from our routines to celebrate a few patriotic holidays such as the Fourth of July and Presidents’ Day. Our schedules often include recognition of unofficial holidays: Mother’s and Father’s Day, Valentine’s Day, even Sweetest Day. It almost seems as if greeting card companies and the flower trade have lobbied for more holidays to be declared, for instance, Secretary’s Day, to boost sales. The common denominator in all of these “Days of Honor” is our wish to recognize, even celebrate events and the achievements of individuals or groups who have contributed significantly to the history of this nation.

In fact, our usual routines have been suspended, put on the back burner, as it were, to commemorate these persons or events. And is this not a wonderful way to demonstrate our recognition as a nation, of the value of their contributions, frequently at sacrifices to their own well being? We need not reiterate the worth of unselfish contributions of the Revolutionary War heroes or Abraham Lincoln or Martin Luther King, Jr. because the impact of their careers has affected our lives so greatly.

But what about the value of the contributions of American artists? What about the worth of their careers, which many pursued unselfishly at extreme sacrifice? Surely our great public museums and private collections are testaments to the value of our nation’s artistic talents. Do our artists not deserve a national day of recognition?

How inestimable is the impact of Mrs. Freake and Baby Mary (ca. 1674), or John Singleton Copley’s “Paul Revere” (1770), “Penn’s Treaty with the Indians” by Benjamin West (1771), Gilbert Stuart’s 1796 “Athenaeum Portrait” of George Washington, which appears on the one-dollar bill, or George Caleb Bingham’s “Fur Traders Descending the Missouri” and William Sidney Mount’s “Dance of the Haymakers” (both 1845), Asher B. Durand’s “Kindred Spirits” (1849), Emanuel Leutze’s “Washington Crossing the Delaware” (1851), Frederic Church’s magnificent “Niagara”(1857), George Catlin’s “The White Cloud, Head Chief of the Iowas” or Albert Bierstadt’s “The Rocky Mountains”. (1863), or “The Gross Clinic” (1875) by Thomas Eakins, William Harnett’s “After the Hunt” (1885), John Sloan’s “Six O’Clock, Winter” (1912), or Charles Demuth, “My Egypt” (1927), or “Tornado over Kansas” by John Steuart Curry (1929), Grant Wood’s “American Gothic” (1930), or Georgia O’Keeffe’s “Cow’s Skull, Red, White and Blue” (1931), or Reginald Marsh’s “Tattoo and Haircut” (1932), or the Mount Rushmore presidential group by Gutzon Borglum (1930-41), or Edward Hopper’s “Night Hawks”?  But while these are stunning, even famous examples of our nation’s greatest art, there are countless other works that are worthy of inclusion into the grand collective contribution given to this nation by our past talents.

I’m convinced that the work of these talents is altogether a great national treasure, well worth commencing a national holiday and all of the appropriate media hype that would go with such an honor. I’m not sure how Congress would react to such a proposal but there is little doubt that the people would join the celebration, if given the opportunity. Think about it. On such a holiday exhibitions of art would be curated, replete with special local and national themes. Celebration dinner parties could be arranged, speeches could be given, articles written, awards and scholarships announced and bands could play as the nation gives tribute to its artistic talents.

Surely it’s time to commemorate the contribution of our great makers whose icons, big and small, have virtually helped to fashion what we can now hail as American greatness.

Tags art, art history, american art
← The "V" WordA Query For The President →

Latest Posts

Featured
November 15, 2018
Critical Statements about American Paintings
November 15, 2018

Who are some of the most revered and disliked individuals in America? Art critics of course. I never fail to be amazed at the elastic reputations of certain art critics whose opinions seem to carry enormous weight one day while the next their ideas appear as puffy words caught uncontrolled in the culture in the so-called critic’s “lack of consistency”. I am acquainted with many artists, art historians, curators, art consultants, collectors, art dealers, art writers and yes, art critics. Generally speaking most of these experts agree that a lack of consistency on the part of the critic is the chief reason for the dwindling of his or her professional authority. This authority is partly earned from the distillation of inaccurate principle. Distilled, for the common critic’s reputation is based upon his useful explanations superior of the art-work.

Read more →
November 15, 2018
The Armory Show a Century Later
October 15, 2018
The Armory Show a Century Later
October 15, 2018

The recent article in the Newtown Bee by Stephen May on the 1913 Armory Show (seen in New York, Chicago and Boston) provides a very worthy overview to say the least. May has correctly presented this famous show as a cultural event which shook the nation’s art-loving crowd. Furthermore, he has pointed out that American art would never be the same because the exhibition included Europe’s most avant-garde art, especially Cubism. Of course the show was highlighted by Duchamp’s unprecedented painting which was the brunt of rude critics and observers in general. Yet, in spite of the hullabaloo created over the 1913 Armory Show, its influence was in fact the most indelible known to this nation’s cultural community until the advent of the next great movement, abstract expressionism. I should point out however that many of those American artists who pursued the cutting edge in their art have been forgotten in the past century when our ancestors were shocked by the art being made in Europe. To know about the armory show is to love American art.

Read more →
October 15, 2018
The “T” Word: Tonalism
April 17, 2018
The “T” Word: Tonalism
April 17, 2018

Have you thought at times that technology, in spite of its usefulness, has also encroached upon your peace of mind, your serenity, your need for inspiration from sources other than television and the internet? If so, you probably shared the feelings of Americans who more than a century ago became weary of the many new inventions that were intended to make life better as the industrial revolution evolved.

These were not old fogies who couldn’t deal with inevitable change, for they welcomed progress, but they were also romanticists unwilling to trade nature for technological advancement. Art historians have referred to them as Tonalists.

Read more →
April 17, 2018
Local and Specific: How Painters Created Modern Landscapes (by Looking in their Own Backyards)
April 1, 2018
Local and Specific: How Painters Created Modern Landscapes (by Looking in their Own Backyards)
April 1, 2018

“Local and specific” refers to the post-Hudson River School focus away from grandiose and Sublime imagery of America’s wilderness toward specific areas of the landscape: quiet, intimate corners of land with which the artist is personally familiar. The most intimate landscape was both more informal and less composed.

Read more →
April 1, 2018
Pretty Young Things
March 15, 2018
Pretty Young Things
March 15, 2018

It was the period of the women’s suffrage movement at the turn of the century…
The fight for equality in the field of Fine Art was just as difficult as their fight for the vote. For the most part, American women painters who worked in the late 19th and early 20th centuries got a raw deal from their male counterparts. Their unenviable lot in life owed mostly to male chauvinism inside and outside of the art community. It was bad enough for a talented, beginning male student but nearly impossible for a young woman to become a successful professional artist. The odds were not in their favor. Usually their efforts, regardless of quality, were sidestepped by the art hierarchy because they were looked upon not as serious art students but as pretty young things seeking husbands.

Read more →
March 15, 2018
The Good Life
March 1, 2018
The Good Life
March 1, 2018

“It was a way of life in a special world for the successful artist of the late nineteenth century; art and life were one, and the pursuit of harmony and tranquility were goals of living as well as painting.”

Richard J. Boyle,  “American Impressionism,” 1974 [p. 179]

Such an idealistic quest was part of the American Genteel Tradition. The ultimate goal was to become financially successful, to fit into society, and to enjoy such luxuries as owning summer homes, hiring cooks and servants, and traveling world-wide to exotic painting locales. No longer a romantic, eccentric recluse, the successful American artist was invariably a well-groomed, business-minded cosmopolitan who knew how to market his “product” and to promote himself (or in some cases, herself) through networking in organizations and exhibitions.

Read more →
March 1, 2018
The "V" Word
February 17, 2018
The "V" Word
February 17, 2018

Without a doubt, the question I’m asked most frequently is how one arrives at a “value” for a picture. Of course, a purist would declare that every art-image has value, if only to its creator. But usually, the V-word (value) is attached only to the monetary considerations of the painting. Therefore, one who determines monetary evaluation of art must consider a variety of factors. While a few of these are determined a priori, therefore subjective, and falling within the parameters of connoisseurship, most factors are objective. Assuming access to certain standard research facilities factors (listed after the break) should provide the best basis for determining the monetary value of a painting.

Read more →
February 17, 2018
Happy American Art Day!
February 1, 2018
Happy American Art Day!
February 1, 2018

Our democracy has evolved celebrating religious holidays, which have become traditional. We all take time off from our routines to celebrate a few patriotic holidays such as the Fourth of July and Presidents’ Day. Our schedules often include recognition of unofficial holidays: Mother’s and Father’s Day, Valentine’s Day, even Sweetest Day. The common denominator in all of these “Days of Honor” is our wish to recognize, even celebrate events and the achievements of individuals or groups who have contributed significantly to the history of this nation.

But what about the value of the contributions of American artists? What about the worth of their careers, which many pursued unselfishly at extreme sacrifice? Surely our great public museums and private collections are testaments to the value of our nation’s artistic talents. Do our artists not deserve a national day of recognition?

Read more →
February 1, 2018
A Query For The President
January 17, 2018
A Query For The President
January 17, 2018

Part of President FDR’s New Deal program, designed to combat the Great Depression, involved a project that was known as the Public Works of Art Project. It called for a six-month plan by government subsidy of artists and ran from December 1933 through June 1934. Painters and others were paid to make art.

I find myself wondering if a similar program would work in today’s world. Shall the government pay painters to make art? Should tax dollars go for those cultural products? Is the subsidy of art a worthy comparison to health care?

Read more →
January 17, 2018
Can you name five American artists?
January 1, 2018
Can you name five American artists?
January 1, 2018

The next time you’re mingling at a party or at any gathering of culturally-minded individuals, ask them to name five American artists quickly, much as they might rattle off the names of the latest movie, car or computer. Chances are, you’ll get no name at all, or ones like Picasso, even Monet. No, that wouldn’t happen, not in circles of educated Americans. Oh yes it can, dear reader.

The truth is that all too many Americans are unaware of their artistic heritage, ironically in deference to the artistic tradition of Mother Europe. Why is this so? Because Americans have always and still do consider themselves the offspring of Europe’s aesthetic legacy.

Read more →
January 1, 2018

Copyright © Richard H. Love 2018